查重技术立功！Imagetwin助力揭露罗切斯特大学医学中心&华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院论文重复问题

图片查重指南针2025-04-21 10:24:42美国

论文信息

2015年11月5日，罗切斯特大学医学中心&华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院Oncotarget发表题为“Recruited mast cells in the tumor microenvironment enhance bladder cancer metastasis via modulation of ERβ/CCL2/CCR2 EMT/MMP9 signals”的论文。

通讯作者：华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院Qun Rao, Yuan Chen

第一作者：罗切斯特大学医学中心Shuyuan Ye

华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院泌尿外科科室介绍-专家信息-门诊时间表-复禾医院库

质疑信息

质疑一：Figure 4G有标记为不同事物的面板重复区域。

Figure 4G has duplicated areas of panels that are labeled as being different things

Imagetwin全网查(如需要查重服务，请联系文末客服微信)

质疑二：图1D：“T24”和“647V”面板似乎显示重叠。

Figure 1D.Blue boxes: The "T24" and "647V" panels appear to show an overlap.

Imagetwin全网查(如需要查重服务，请联系文末客服微信)

质疑三：图 3D 所示的 647V scr Ctrl 培养物不应与图 6D 所示的 647V 培养物相同。

I dont think the 647V scr Ctrl culture shown in Figure 3D is supposed to be identical to the 647V culture shown in Figure 6D.

Imagetwin全网查(如需要查重服务，请联系文末客服微信)

质疑四：图 7A 中用红色方框勾勒出的大鼠图像背景有一些相似之处。此外，作者似乎试图对图片进行裁剪，使其看起来大鼠是成对成像的，然而，中心面板显示，通风口的长度不同，因此中心图片明显是拼接的，这让人相信其他图片也是拼接在一起的，但图片被裁剪，使两个通风口看起来是一个通风口。作者能否详细描述检查和成像过程，让读者相信其中一些图像不是同一只老鼠的图像，而是经过重新定位后看起来像另一只老鼠的图像？

There are some similarities in the background of the rat images in Figure 7A outlined in red squares. In addition, it appears that the authors tried to crop the pictures so that it appears that the rats were imaged in pairs, however, the central panel shows that the vents are different lengths so the center image is clearly spliced which leads one to believe that the other images were also spliced together but the images were cropped so that 2 vents appear to be a single vent. Can the authors describe, in detail, the examination and imaging process so that the reader is convinced that some of the images are not of the same rat that has been repositioned to look like a different rat?