“秉持严谨、深入、持续、开放与创新的态度,尊重他人成果,携手交流共进,推动科研发展。”
Research Frontline
科研前线
01
—
问题论文
标题:Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning Protects Rats Against Cerebral Ischemia via HIF-1α/AMPK/HSP70 Pathway
期刊:Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
单位:上海普陀区中心医院
发表时间:2016年11月28日
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-016-0444-2
研究摘要:
Remote limb ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a clinically feasible strategy to protect against ischemia/reperfusion injury, but the knowledge concerning the mechanism underlying RIPC is scarce. This study was performed to examine the effect of RIPC on brain tissue suffering from ischemia challenge and explore its underlying mechanism in a rat model. The animals were divided into four groups: Sham, middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), RIPC, and MCAO+RIPC. We found that previous exposure to RIPC significantly attenuated neurological dysfunction and lessened brain edema in MCAO+RIPC group. Moreover, other important events were observed in MCAO+RIPC group, including substantial decrements in the concentrations of oxidative response indicators [malondialdehyde (MDA), 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and protein carbonyl], significant reductions in levels of inflammation mediators [myeloperoxidase (MPO), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6], and significant decline in neuronal apoptosis revealed by a smaller number of TUNEL-positive cells. Interestingly, both MCAO and RIPC groups exhibited meaningful elevations in the levels of HIF-1a, HSP70, and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) compared to Sham group, and previous exposure to RIPC further elevated the levels of HIF-1a, HSP70, and AMPK in MCAO+RIPC group. Furthermore, the administration of YC-1 (HIF-1 inhibitor), 8-bAMP (AMPK inhibitor), and Quercetin (HSP70 inhibitor) to MCAO+RIPC rats demonstrated that HIF-1α/AMPK/HSP70 was involved in RIPC-mediated protection against cerebral ischemia.02
—
具体说明
#1 René Aquarius comment accepted April 2025
评论通过,2025 年 4 月
Dear authors, 尊敬的作者们,
We found unexpected overlap within one of your figures and between a figure presented in this study and a figure presented in another study (see enclosed image below).
我们在您的其中一个图中以及本研究中展示的图与另一研究中展示的图之间发现了意外的重叠(见下附图像)。
The following papers are affected:
受影响的论文如下:
Paper 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27896629/
论文 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27896629/
Paper 2: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27446260/
论文 2: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27446260/
We will notify the publisher to resolve these issues.
我们将通知出版商解决这些问题。
参考信息
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10571-016-04442
https://pubpeer.com/publications/EEA5A4650EAD8786E2FB07FEA9D7F6#0
本平台对于科研问题的探讨,始终保持严谨、深入、持续、开放和创新的态度。所有推文信源,均来源于pubpeer、For Better Science等网站公开质疑。我们从来没有、也永远不会主动查重论文并去pubpeer上质疑。我们尊重他人的研究成果和贡献,通过交流和合作,共同推动科研领域的进步和发展。