浙江医院Hang Lin（第一兼通讯）论文被撤稿，蛋白印迹以及病理图面板重复

Two images in Figure 3B seem to overlap, but are described differently.

This paper was identified with 'The Clear Skies Papermill Alarm.'

There may also be some overlaps within Figure 3C, and also between Figure 3C and Figure 2f of a BioMed Research International paper.

The cropping of the gel strip images seems tighter in the earlier paper, suggesting that perhaps the involvement of a party who prepared both papers from a larger original image.

Biochemistry and Cell Biology (2020), doi: 10.1139/bcb-2019-0171, discussed here: https://pubpeer.com/publications/5DCCCED0787614A62F955AD9C86F18

BioMed Research International (2021), doi: 10.1155/2021/6622342, discussed here: https://pubpeer.com/publications/3EDC86BCDCE8C5C695BC277A169002

• 图9a与另一篇包含共同作者文章中的图7A图像面板重复。

In Figure 2E? There seem to be some bands that appear very similar, with only a difference in vertical dimensions.

? 在图4E的“HOS”列中，“Cleaved caspase-3”（裂解的半胱天冬酶-3）行的蛋白条带与该图“Cleaved PARP”（裂解的聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶）行的蛋白条带完全相同。

? 在图3B的迁移面板“U2OS shRNA-1”的左上角部分，与同一图中“shRNA-1”侵袭面板的左下角部分存在部分重复。

鉴于这些图像问题，主编们对该研究的结论失去了信心，并决定撤回该文章。

此次撤回符合《Biochemistry and Cell Biology》杂志及其出版商加拿大科学出版公司的出版政策。

作者无法联系到以对此撤回声明作出回应。